Legal Opinion
Pauling v. National Review, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1966PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel J. Silverman, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case in the trial of an action for libel.
Plaintiff, Dr. Linus C. Pauling, is a world famous scientist, winner of a Nobel Prize for chemistry and of a Nobel Peace Prize. Defendants are the corporate owner, and the individual publisher and editor of a fortnightly magazine called National Review.
There are two causes of action based on two ariicles, one in the National Review of July 17, 1962 and one in the issue of September 25, 1962.
*976The first article says, among other things:
“ The Collaborators
“ What are we going to do…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Beauharnais v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- William F. Buckley, Jr. v. Franklin H. LittellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- William F. Buckley, Jr. v. New York Post CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Cahill v. Hawaiian Paradise Park CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Linus Pauling v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.