United States v. Quaintance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Joseph Allen Butts, Danuel Dean Quaintance, and Mary Helen Quain-tance were indicted for conspiracy to possess and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. 1 The defendants moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing the prosecution constituted a substantial burden on the exercise of their religion in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”). 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb-2000bb-4. The district court denied the motion and granted the government’s motion in limine barring the defendants from raising a RFRA defense at trial. The defendants filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. WamplerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. QuaintanceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Timothy AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.