Legal Opinion

United States v. Wampler

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2010No. 09-6229, 09-6230, 09-6231PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

The defendants argue that an unconsummated plea agreement between their former corporate employer and the government bars their current prosecution and upcoming trial. Despite this, the district court held the defendants must stand trial. So unless we hear their appeal now, the defendants worry, their “right not to be tried” under the terms of the plea agreement will be lost forever. But whatever else the plea agreement may do, one thing it doesn’t do is confer jurisdiction on this court to entertain an interlocutory appeal. Generally, a defendant must await a final…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick"Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Winn v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Tucker v. Faith Bible Chapel Int'l.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  4. In Re MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATIONCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API