Legal Opinion

Burnap v. Sharpsteen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Winnebago county j the Hon. James Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This suit grows out of an oral contract between Mary A. Burnap and Mary J. Sharpsteen, both residents of the city of Bockford, for the exchange of certain real estate. The negotiations which resulted in the contract, took place during the summer and early .autumn of the year 1892, and were carried on, on the part of Mary A. Burnap, by Charles A. Burnap, her husband and agent, and on the part of Mary J. Sharpsteen, by B. A. Knight, her agent. Mrs. Burnap was the owner of four houses and lots situated in South Bockford, which were then subject to a mortgage for $3000, but on which payments had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiswall v. McGowanNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  2. Brooks v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
  3. Miller v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. HertzIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Houston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. Payne v. HallgarthOregon Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API