Legal Opinion

Payne v. Hallgarth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Union : Robert Eaicin, Judge. Suit by Mary E. Payne, Sarah. Gunnell, Ann Thornton, Joseph Hallgarth, and William Hallgarth against Jane Hallgarth and others. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The plaintiffs, Mary E. Payne, Sarah Gunnell, Ann Thornton, Joseph Hallgarth, and William Hallgarth, and the defendant Charles Hallgarth, are the brothers *431and sisters and only heirs of Sibrit Hallgrath, who died intestate in Union County, Oregon, on November 21, 1893. On the twenty-first of October preceding his demise he executed and duly acknowledged a certain deed purporting to convey the premises in dispute to the defendant Jane Hallgath, and the only question involved in this suit is whether there was a delivery of such deed to the grantee to take effect presently, for it is not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sneathen v. SneathenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Brown v. WesterfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Trask v. TraskSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Fain v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Archambeau v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Swank v. SwankOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Sappingfield v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Jobse v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. White v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API