Legal Opinion

Hickory White Trucks, Inc. v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1976No. 7525DC952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the court erred in granting summary judgment for Travelers because the evidence raises a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he was the third-party beneficiary of a contract between plaintiff and Travelers requiring Travelers to pay his truck repair bill.

When motion for summary judgment is made, the court must look at the record in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. However, when the motion is supported as provided in the rule, “An adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Millsaps v. WILKES CONTRACTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Shearin v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raleigh Paint & Wallpaper Co. v. Peacock & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. RALEIGH PAINT & WALLPAPER v. Peacock & Assoc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API