Legal Opinion

Shearin v. National Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1975No. 757SC224PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether under the Constitution and laws of this State a summary judgment may be granted in favor of the party having the burden of proof when his right to recover depends upon the credibility of his witnesses. On authority of Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.E. 2d 297 (1971), we conclude that the answer is No.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(a) clearly contemplates the possibility of granting a summary judgment in favor of a “party seeking to recover upon a claim, counterclaim, or crossclaim,” and normally such a party has the burden of proof. Subsection…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Landrum v. ArmbrusterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Alpine Village, Inc. v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Hickory White Trucks, Inc. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Equitable Leasing Corp. v. Kingsmen Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Shearin v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API