State ex rel. State Highway Department v. Branchau
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
The State of New Mexico brought an eminent domain action in the District Court of Quay County seeking to acquire some of Branchau’s property. The jury returned a verdict in the sum of $21,800 and the State appealed. We reverse.
The State’s basic contention was that the trial court erred in permitting Nathan Bell, an expert witness called on behalf of Branchau, to testify even though he was not listed in the pretrial order. The State objected immediately after opening argument when Bell’s name was revealed and later when Bell was called to testify. The State also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Transwestern Pipe Line Company v. YandellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Tobeck v. United Nuclear-Homestake PartnersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Johnson v. Citizens Casualty Company of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Herrera v. Springer CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- Farmers, Inc. v. Dal MacHine & Fabricating, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Torrance County Mental Health Program, Inc. v. New Mexico Health & Environment DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Lewis Ex Rel. Lewis v. SamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Gilmore v. DuderstadtNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Fahrbach v. Diamond Shamrock, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.