Legal Opinion
United States v. Engelhard-Hanovia, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1964No. 61 CR 1105PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
This is an application by defendant Westinghouse Electric Corporation for leave to withdraw its plea of not guilty and to enter a plea of nolo contendere pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.1
The indictment in this case alleges that Westinghouse and the other named defendants conspired to restrain trade in the sale and distribution of brazing alloys in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The violation alleged is a conspiracy to fix resale prices of brazing alloys, to require distributors to adhere to such prices, and to boycott and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Standard Ultramarine & Color Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Barnsdall Refining Corporation v. Birnamwood Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
- Department of Water & Power v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Michigan v. Morton Salt CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
- Dalweld Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. HousemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971