Legal Opinion
Dalweld Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1966No. 65 Civ. 654PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKEL, District Judge.
In this action for treble damages and injunctive relief under the Clayton and Sherman Acts, one defendant, Westinghouse Electric. Corporation, moves to strike from the complaint allegations relating to a criminal antitrust judgment upon a plea of nolo contendere entered against this defendant on April 3, 1964. The allegations in question, reversing the order of their presentation in the complaint, are:(1) That plaintiffs propose to rely upon the criminal judgment in this action “[p]ursuant to the provisions of [section 5(a) of the Clayton Act,] 15 U.S. C. Section 16”…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- State of Michigan v. Morton Salt CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
- Patterson v. OdellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Polychrome Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966