Zuniga v. Evans
Utah Supreme Court
1Concurrence
FOLLAND, Justice.
I concur. The decision disapproves a statement in a previous decision of this court in Smith v. Edwards, 81 Utah 244, 17 P. (2d) 264, 267, to the effect that “to allege that a person is ‘insolvent’ is alleging a pure conclusion,” and holds that an allegation of insolvency is the allegation of an ultimate fact and is a sufficient allegation of insolvency without the allegation of the probative facts. Because of this holding, I desire to add the following observations and citation of authority: Such an allegation is sufficient in this kind of case, and this view, I think, is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sill v. Kentucky Coal & Timber Development Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
- Smith v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Utseth v. Pratt-Mallory Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Coal City Coal & Coke Co. v. Hazard Powder Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Rohr v. StantonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.