Legal Opinion

Smith v. Edwards

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1932No. 5121PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, District Judge.

The defendants are the appellants. The plaintiffs are the respondents. We shall generally refer to them as plaintiffs and defendants, specifying them by name or otherwise when necessary.

On the 6th day of December, 1920, the defendant George H. Edwards and his wife conveyed to their son, Lawrence Edwards, also a defendant, by warranty deed, two tracts of land aggregating about 66 acres generally referred to in the evidence as tracts B and C.

On the 8th day of December, 1920, a deed passed between the same parties of like import for two additional tracts of land designated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duxbury v. BoiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Leavengood v. McGeeOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Paxton v. Paxton, Walker Et Ux. v. SameUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Stivens v. SummersOhio Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Leasure v. ForquerOregon Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Vinlis Construction Co. v. RoreckNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Zuniga v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Peterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
  5. Leach v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API