Legal Opinion
Morville v. United Parcel Service
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1983No. Civ. No. 30193PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
Plaintiff (Morville) sought damages from defendants Scriptomatic, Inc., (Scriptomatic) and United Parcel Service (UPS) for breach of contract, negligence and conversion for the loss of unique and irreplaceable mailing lists. The trial court granted UPS’ motion for summary judgment.1
*554Facts
Morville is a mail order postage stamp dealer whose sales are accomplished by advertising in national and international publications. It develops mailing lists from responses of interested buyers and continuously uses and updates these lists.
Morville orally contracted with Scriptomatic to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. SperlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barbara Linhart v. New York Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024