Legal Opinion

People v. Sperl

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1976No. Crim. 26259PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

In a nonjury trial defendant Sperl, who was the Marshal for Los Angeles County, was convicted in count I of violating Penal Code section 424, subdivision 3, in that he had knowingly kept false accounts relating to the receipt, etc., of public moneys (Legislative Advocates transaction); in count III of violating section 424, subdivision 1, in that he misappropriated public moneys for the use of another (Candidate’s Driver transaction); in count V of violating section 424, subdivision 3, in that he knowingly kept false accounts or made false entries or erasures in accounts…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. Superior Court (Hartway)California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. SchmiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. VallergaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Stanford v. Iowa State ReformatorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API