People v. Sperl
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
In a nonjury trial defendant Sperl, who was the Marshal for Los Angeles County, was convicted in count I of violating Penal Code section 424, subdivision 3, in that he had knowingly kept false accounts relating to the receipt, etc., of public moneys (Legislative Advocates transaction); in count III of violating section 424, subdivision 1, in that he misappropriated public moneys for the use of another (Candidate’s Driver transaction); in count V of violating section 424, subdivision 3, in that he knowingly kept false accounts or made false entries or erasures in accounts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. Superior Court (Hartway)California Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. SchmiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. VallergaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Stanford v. Iowa State ReformatorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.