Harara v. ConocoPhillips Co.

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS

ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

On September 23, 2004, I granted in part and denied in part defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint (“SAC”) against defendant Conoco-Phillips Company (“Conoco”) and dismissed plaintiffs claims against Dean Masterton, a Conoco Account Representative. Now before me are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs remaining claims against Conoco. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is denied and defendant’s motion is granted. 1