Legal Opinion

Rose Marks, D/B/A Middlebelt-Eureka Shell v. Shell Oil Company, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1987No. 86-1959PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Rose Marks (“Marks”) appeals from a summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, dismissing her action under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (“PMPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq., against defendant-appellee Shell Oil Company (“Shell”), 643 F.Supp. 1050. Because we believe that it was an abuse of discretion for the district court to grant Shell’s summary judgment motion without first considering and ruling on Marks’ pending motion to amend her complaint, we VACATE the judgment of the district and REMAND…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Miles Tefft v. James Seward, A/K/A Jessie SewardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Douglas Estes v. Kentucky Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Herbert Espey v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Marks v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Nafziger v. McDermott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Spies v. VoinovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Oleson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. James Ellison v. Ford Motor Company Woodhaven Stamping Plant and Frank DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Lowrey v. Texas a & M University SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API