Legal Opinion

Zucco v. Kane

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 2, 2003PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

We are asked to decide whether statements the plaintiff made in a settlement agreement may be admitted against her when she testifies to contrary facts in a subsequent action against a third party. We agree with the trial judge that the statements were admissible and therefore affirm.

*5041. Background. The plaintiff, Catherine E. Zueco, was a charge nurse at the Loomis House, a nursing home in Holyoke, when she twisted her left foot while ascending a flight of stairs. She received medical treatment but was unable to return to work for quite some time. She applied for and received workers’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Hull v. Attleboro Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Kszepka's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Mailman's Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp. v. LizotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColturiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Locator Services Group, Ltd. v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Global Investors Agent Corp. v. National Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Pardo v. General Hospital Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Dahms v. Cognex Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API