Legal Opinion

Marks v. Jaffa

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided December 15, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action by Rudolph Marks against Joseph Jaffa to restrain the publication by defendant of a picture of plaintiff in a newspaper, of which defendant is editor. Plaintiff moves to continue the injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The plaintiff, an actor by profession, is now undergoing a course of studies in the law school of the university *909preparatory to admission to the bar. There is another actor by the name of Mogulesko, equally well known as the plaintiff. The defendant is the editor of a newspaper called “Der Wachter,” published in this city, and extensively patronized. The defendant devised a scheme by which he was to publish in his paper a picture-of the two actors, with an invitation to the readers of his journal to vote with the view to determining who was the more popular of the two. The plaintiff declined…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. CurtisNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Schuyler v. CurtisNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Melvin v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Atkinson v. John E. Doherty & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API