Legal Opinion

Schuyler v. Curtis

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

At chambers. Action by Philip Schuyler against Ernest Curtis, Alice Donlevy, and others for an injunction. Plaintiff moves for the continuance ■of a preliminary injunction. Granted.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

This is a motion for the continuance of a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from proceeding with a project for making and exhibiting a statue of the late Mrs. George Schuyler, who before her marriage was a Miss Mary M. Hamilton. Mrs. Schuyler had no children; but the plaintiff, who is a' nephew and step-son, brings .this action in behalf of himself and all her other nearest living relatives. The defendants, except Hartley, who is the sculptor engaged to execute the statue, are members of the “Woman’s Memorial Fund Association,” which has undertaken to raise money by public…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Henry v. Cherry WebbSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1909
  3. Corliss v. E. W. Walker Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1893
  4. Marks v. JaffaThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  5. Miller v. GillespieMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API