Legal Opinion

Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 2000No. 99CA1162PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation (the insurer), appeals the trial court's award of prejudgment and postjudgment interest to plaintiffs, Doris E. Peterman, John H. Peter-man, Sally Joseph, and Penny Hardrick (the insureds). We affirm.

The insureds were injured in an automobile accident with an uninsured driver, The insureds brought an action against the uninsured driver, notified the insurer of the action, and obtained a default judgment against the uninsured driver well in excess of their uninsured motorist coverage.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Allabashi v. Lincoln National Sales Corp. of Colorado-WyomingColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Vasquez v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Sosin v. SosinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. USAA v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. Ross v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API