Legal Opinion

Fancsali v. University Health Center

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 2000PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether the Superior Court properly affirmed the trial court’s judgment of non pros in the Appellants’ medical malpractice action. We reverse.

Susan Fancsali was born on July 16, 1992. Shortly after her birth, she suffered from hypoxia and encephalopathy and contracted Group B Streptococcus. On July 6, 1994, Paul and Kimberlee Fancsali, Susan’s parents, filed a praecipe for writ of summons naming numerous physicians and hospitals as defendants. On August 24,1994, various defendants ruled the Fancsalis to file a complaint; five days later,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Consolidated National Bank v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Klein v. CissoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Wilson v. Bensalem Township School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Levitt v. PatrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. SkevofilaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Pohl v. NGK Metals Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Becker, H. v. M.S. Reilly, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Truesdale v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API