Legal Opinion

Burke v. Bassett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1929No. Appeal, 288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The facts in this case are similar to those in the preceding case. The Middle-City Real Estate Company, grantee of the premises, and Bassett and Kille, grantors and officers of the company, proposed to extend their garage located on the south side of Latimer Street between Fifteenth and Sixteenth Streets in Philadelphia. It is but a few doors from Hollinger’s garage in the previous case on the same side of the street. The plaintiff brought this bill to enjoin the construction. The extension in the rear was to be three stories high and it was planned to replace…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Satterthwait v. GibbsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Long v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Miner v. Loomis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API