Long v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiffs’ bill asks that defendants be enjoined from establishing and maintaining an automobile filling, sales and service station at the corner of North Fifth and Oley Streets in the City of Reading, which location is within a district claimed by plaintiffs to be strictly residential in character, and in which they own property, and with their families reside. A decree was entered perpetually enjoining defendants from establishing the service station as proposed at the location designated. Defendants appealed.
The court below finds as facts that the neighborhood in question…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burke v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Nesbit v. RiesenmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Carney v. Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Burke v. BassettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Essick v. ShillamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Menger v. PassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Pennell v. Kennedy Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Thomas v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Franklin Street Methodist Episcopal Church v. Crystal Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.