Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Andrade

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 2006No. A112673PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*809Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

In this case we hold that the Board of Prison Terms (Board)1 misconstrued section 2402 of title 15 of the former California Administrative Code, now California Code of Regulations, by requiring an inmate to have parole plans in both California and Mexico. The prisoner is serving a life sentence for murder and has a hold placed on him so he can be deported to his native country of Mexico. At the time of the commitment offense, the prisoner was in the United States illegally and remains an illegal alien. Despite the Board’s erroneous interpretation of section 2402, we affirm…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Brewer v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. In Re ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re CabreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re TwinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In Re PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. In Re VirayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API