Legal Opinion
Luikart v. Boland
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1933No. 1723PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
This is an action to set aside certain conveyances made by Edintha H. McLaughlin as fraudulent. There was a judgment for defendants, from which the plaintiff has appealed.
The case was tried and is appealed here upon the theory that the Farmers State Bank of Riverton was defrauded by the conveyances in question. Its claim was filed with and allowed by the plaintiff, the administrator of the estate of Edintha H. McLaughlin, and arises out of the following facts: On January 10, 1920, the Riverton Construction Company made and delivered to the bank two promissory notes of $5000…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wallace v. Branch BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
- Clinton v. Hibbs'Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- New York Life Insurance v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Ozburn v. Morris & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. FairchildNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stone v. First Wyoming Bank N. A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- In Re the Estate of RolaterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Rick Miller, Appointed Wrongful Death Representative for the Estate of Julia Faye Miller v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., a Foreign Corporation and Casper Operations, Llc, a Foreign Llc, D/B/A Life Care Center of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. v. BoydWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Stone v. First Wyoming BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.