Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Fairchild

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1928No. 24886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

This action was begun by the Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, plaintiff, against defendants Arthur R. Nichols, L. A. Newell, A. F. Newell, H. L. Clarke, and Herman E. Fairchild. The defendants were either officers or directors of the Farmers: & Merchants National Bank of Fairbury while it was a going concern. The action, as alleged by plaintiff, is based on an agreement of indemnity executed by the bank as principal and the plaintiff as surety and was given to cover school funds of school district No. 8, in Jefferson county, which were subsequently deposited in the bank. The bank…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clinton v. Hibbs'Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Ross v. CravenNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Riiff v. RiibeNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luikart v. BolandWyoming Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API