New York Life Insurance v. Daley
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of an action upon granting defendant’s motion for a nonsuit.
The action is one to recover payment upon a promissory note alleged to have been" made and delivered to plaintiff by defendant. It appears that in 1894 plaintiff issued to T. J. Daley, husband of defendant, a policy of life insurance wherein defendant was named as beneficiary, payment of the premium upon which was made by a promissory note in the sum of $437, signed by T. J. Daley and Sarah H. Daley, the defendant, by T. J. Daley, her attorney in fact. Shortly after the execution of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Reynolds v. BrumagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Skirvin v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Golinsky v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Penfold v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Potter v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Lo Presti v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Nelson v. Specialty Records, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.