Legal Opinion

Hall v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 20, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit. Heard on petition of defendant for new trial, and denied.'

1Opinion of the CourtDubois, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought to recover the sum of $1,573.75, with interest, for services rendered during a period of twenty weeks, and for supplies furnished by the plaintiff, a physician and surgeon, to the defendant's employee, a carpenter, who was injured, in the course of his employment, at its power station in Warren, R. I., by steam and hot water in an accidental explosion. The defendant denies liability, and claims that it never engaged the services of the plaintiff.

After verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant has petitioned for a new trial upon the grounds that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. RodriguesIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Marquette & Ontonagon Railroad v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. PrinceIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pacific Railroad v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raymond v. B. I. F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  2. Lichtenstein v. ParnessSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API