Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. Parness
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided August 21, 1953No. Equity No. 2195PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
99 A.2d 3 (1953)
LICHTENSTEIN
v.
PARNESS et al.
Equity No. 2195.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
August 21, 1953.
Israel H. Press, Isadore S. Horenstein, Providence, for petitioner.
Boss & Conlan, Francis W. Conlan, Providence, for respondent.
O'CONNELL, Justice.
This employee's petition was brought under the workmen's compensation act, general laws 1938, chapter 300, to adjudge an employer and his insurance carrier in contempt for failure to comply with the terms of a preliminary agreement entered into by the parties on June 27, 1951 and approved by the director of labor on July 10, 1951. The agreement…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. ParnessSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1953
- Furst v. CarricoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Hunt v. ReillySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1902
- Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co. v. GiacoppaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1943
- Personal Finance Co. v. Henley-Kimball Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Santos v. City Council of City of East ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965