Legal Opinion

Loeser v. Loeser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1915No. 4421PublishedCited by 7 opinions

' Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; James W. Steen, Judge. Action by Frank Loeser against Carl Loeser and Otto Loeser. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was filed by the plaintiff in error, Frank Loeser, in the district court of Alfalfa county, to cancel a deed, made by Carl Loeser, one of the defendants in error, to Otto Loeser, the pther defendant in error, to certain real estate described in the petition. The grounds upon which the deed is asked to be canceled are that the plaintiff in error on February 28, 1912, obtained a judgment for $2,000 against Carl Loeser, and that the transfer of said real estate was fraudulently made in order to defeat the collection of this judgment. Defendant Carl Loeser died…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunnington v. LoeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. McCullough v. GilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. Lozier v. BogleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James v. UNKNOWN TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Corliss v. Davidson & Case Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Schneider v. DeckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Killough v. Ft. Supply Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API