Williams v. Hewitt
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court, Davidson County.— Johk Allison, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lansden
This is ejectment, and the facts appear by stipulation of counsel as follows:
*690The land in controversy is a narrow strip, fronting about two feet on the north margin of Broad street, and measuring about four feet on an alley in the rear, and running back 160 feet and six inches on the east side, and somewhat less distance on the west side.
P. L. Nichol owned the whole of lot No. 61, of which the land in controversy is a part. Nichol sold to Michael Halloran the eastern half of lot No. 61 in June, 1864, Halloran understood that he bought and paid for a fifty-foot lot, which was exactly one-half…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kirkman v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
- Erck v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Marvel v. Barley Mill Road HomesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Marvel v. Barley Mill Road Homes, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Peoples v. HagamanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Buchanan v. NixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.