Legal Opinion
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Exxon Seamen's Union
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 14, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2471 (AJL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
Currently before the court is the motion of plaintiff Exxon Shipping Company (“Exxon”) for summary judgment to vacate an arbitration award (the “Arbitration Award”) in favor of the Exxon Seamen’s Union (“Union”) which required Morris Foster (“Foster”), an able-bodied seaman and helmsman employed by Exxon, to be reinstated to rather than discharged from employment. 1 Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and appears to be appropriate.
For the reasons set forth below, the Arbitration Award is…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Exxon Shipping Company v. Exxon Seamen's UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- TM Marketing, Inc. v. Art & Antiques Associates, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Andrews v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Exxon Corp. v. Local Union 877, International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. Exxon Seamen's UnionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.