Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Houston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1967No. 41407PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

On May 22, 1964, Andrew Jackson Hamel executed an instrument designating it his last will and testament. He had no wife or children, his wife having predeceased him more than a year before. His nearest relatives were brothers and sisters, nieces and nephews. Two of his nephews lived in Tulsa, where he also had resided for a number of years. One of the nephews, Houston Hubbell, was made the sole dev-isee of the residue of Mr. Hamel’s property by the terms of said will. One of the provisions of the will was a bequest of $20,000.00 to Mr. Hamel’s attorney who prepared the will.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Llewellyn's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. In Re Cook's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Hunter v. BattiestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. McCarty v. WeatherlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Anderson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of MaherasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. In Re Estate of HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Matter of Estate of BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Matter of Estate of SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. White v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API