Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1952No. 34063PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by this appeal is whether the will of Arne N. Anderson should be admitted to probate, or whether probate should be denied on the presented contest on the ground of undue influence. In such contest the cause is one of purely equitable cognizance and it is the duty of this court to examine the entire record and weigh the evidence. See In re Chubbee’s Will, 133 Okla. 156, 271 P. 681, where it was held in paragraph one of the syllabus:

“Will contest cases are of purely equitable cognizance, and upon appeal, in such cases, from the district court to the Supreme Court it is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re Estate of NuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McQueen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. In Re Knutson's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of MaherasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. In Re Estate of HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Matter of Estate of BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Close v. FlanaryNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hubbell v. HoustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API