Legal Opinion

Harmony Ditch Co. v. Sweeney

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1924No. 1054PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

This action was for damages alleged by plaintiff to have been caused by the trespass of defendant’s sheep on plaintiff’s irrigating ditch, and for an injunction to secure the plaintiff against the continuance or repetition of such trespass. The trial was had without a jury and judgment on general findings was for defendant with costs. The plaintiff has brought the case here by proceeding in error. The only question we need consider is whether under’, the admitted or undisputed facts the plaintiff was entitled to damages.

In the spring of 1919 the plaintiff, a corporation,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. City of Bellevue v. DalyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Whittaker v. StangvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Foust v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Durfee v. GarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coulsen v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Eugene C. Walsh and Lois M. Walsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Nielson v. SandbergUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Sagebrush Development, Inc. v. MoehrkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pioneer Irrigation District v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API