Legal Opinion

People v. J. Clyde K.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1987No. A032098PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, Acting P. J.

This case is illustrative of an oft-heard proposition: Confession is not only good for the soul (an old Scottish proverb) but it often gets the wrongdoer “off the hook.” Here, two minors complain that a confession which caused them to become wards of the juvenile court was involuntarily coerced. We conclude that existing statutory and case law support their position and accordingly reverse the orders of the juvenile court.

On March 8, 1985, petitions were filed in the superior court charging defendants J. Clyde K. (Clyde) and Tommy C. (Tommy) with burglary (Pen. Code,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BadgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. Shawn D.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. VasilaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. Juma P.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. BadgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API