Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 25, 1999No. 0873982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDER, Judge.

Bradford Ramey Ingram (appellant) appeals from his bench trial conviction for driving under the influence (DUI), second offense, pursuant to Code § 18.2-266. On appeal, he contends the administrative suspension of his license pursuant to Code § 46.2-391.2 was invalid because he did not refuse to take the breath test but rather was prevented from doing so by his asthma. As a consequence, he contends that the suspension was punitive and that his subsequent DUI conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. For the reasons that follow, we affirm appellant’s conviction.

I

FACTS

Appellan…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  2. Depsky v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  3. Easter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. StumpRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2006
  5. Dorsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API