Ingram v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
Bradford Ramey Ingram (appellant) appeals from his bench trial conviction for driving under the influence (DUI), second offense, pursuant to Code § 18.2-266. On appeal, he contends the administrative suspension of his license pursuant to Code § 46.2-391.2 was invalid because he did not refuse to take the breath test but rather was prevented from doing so by his asthma. As a consequence, he contends that the suspension was punitive and that his subsequent DUI conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. For the reasons that follow, we affirm appellant’s conviction.
I
FACTS
Appellan…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dorsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Depsky v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Easter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Commonwealth v. StumpRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2006
- Dorsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000