Legal Opinion

Eufaula Drugs, Inc. v. Tmesys, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 22, 2006No. Civil Action 2:05cv300-MHTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

This lawsuit is before the court on plaintiff Eufaula Drugs, Ine.’s motion to remand to state court for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. The motion will be granted.

I. REMOVAL-AND-REMAND STANDARDS

“While a defendant does have a right, given by statute, to remove in certain situations, plaintiff is still the master of his own claim.” Burns v. Windsor Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1095 (11th Cir.1994). Put differently, federal courts, as courts of limited jurisdiction, possess jurisdiction to hear a particular case only to the extent authorized by statute or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Jacqueline Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Herb v. PitcairnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation. Appeals of Robert A. HugginsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tmesys, Inc. v. Eufaula Drugs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Med-Surg Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
  3. Title Pro Closings, L.L.C. v. Tudor InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
  4. May's Distributing Co. v. Total Containment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
  5. Smith v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN R. CO., INC.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API