Rogillio v. Rogillio
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
PIERCE, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. David and Helen Rogillio were married for eleven years, living in Vicksburg with their minor son, Morgan. Helen, who is disabled, alleges error in the chancery court’s failure to award permanent periodic alimony. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Because the chancellor made errors in her accounting of the marital assets that resulted in an abuse of discretion, we reverse and remand.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
¶ 2. Helen and David were married in September 1997. One child was born to the marriage, a son, Morgan, who was approximately six years old…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Sanderson v. SandersonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Drake L. Lewis v. Tonia D. Lewis PagelMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Rogillio v. RogillioMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- Davenport v. DavenportMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Mauldin v. MauldinCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.