Legal Opinion
Sheek v. Crimestoppers Alarm Systems
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 6, 1989No. 1288PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Judge:
Appellant, Gene Sheek, brought this action against respondents, Crimestoppers Alarm Systems, and Curtis M. Head, alleging negligence, breach of contract, fraud and unfair trade practices. The case was referred to the Master for trial. After a hearing on the matter, the Master found in favor of respondents. Sheek appeals. We affirm.
Sheek met Head at a home show where Head had a booth for Crimestoppers. Sheek subsequently contacted Head to install a burglar alarm system in Sheek’s home in Mauldin. In 1984, Sheek contacted Head again to install an alarm system in Sheek’s new home.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- May v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Wayne Smith Construction Co. v. Wolman, Duberstein, & ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Rogers v. Nation Ex Rel. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Santee Port. Cement Corp. v. Mid-State Redi-Mix Concrete Co. Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
3Cited by16 opinions
- Branche Builders, Inc. v. CogginsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- South Carolina Federal Savings Bank v. Thornton-Crosby Development Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Solley v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- State v. RosierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Jordan v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.