Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Nation Ex Rel. Clayton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1985No. 0389PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Respondents William A. Rogers and Emma H. Rogers purchased the home of the appellant Annie Lee Nation at a foreclosure sale. Upon Nation’s refusal to vacate, the Rog- erses commenced an action to eject her. She responded by claiming that she was incompetent at the time she was served with the foreclosure papers and since no guardian ad litem was appointed to represent her, the foreclosure and sale should be set aside. The trial court, finding that Nation had failed to prove her incompetency, refused to vacate the judgment against her and ordered her evicted. We affirm the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Edge v. Dunean MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  4. Tuten v. Almeda FarmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Thompson v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Palmetto Dunes Resort v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Sheek v. Crimestoppers Alarm SystemsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Skull Creek Club Ltd. Partnership v. Cook & Book, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Crewe v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Grapner v. Atlantic Land Title Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API