Legal Opinion

Messick v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1934No. 24452PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

R. M. Messick, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, brought suit in the district court of Carter county, Okla., against Roy M. Johnson, hereinafter referred to as defendant, for the sum of $4,-536.92, with interest.

Plaintiff’s cause of action was based on a contract and supplemental agreement hereinafter set forth:

“Agreement — Ardmore, Okla., Nov. 17, 1926. I. Roy M. Johnson, of Ardmore, Okla., hereby retain Robert M. Messick, of Kansas City, Mo., to make an audit, valuation and abstract of all life insurance policy contracts I have or am otherwise interested, in, and to counsel and advise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graves v. NichlosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Vincent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Miller v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. McCully v. McCullySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Camp v. Black Gold Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Williams v. Seminole County Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API