Legal Opinion
Webb v. . Tomlinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The evidence on the mooted question as to whether the deceased was an employee or an independent contractor is susceptible of either interpretation. The findings of the Industrial Commission, therefore, are conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact. Parrish v. Armour Co., 200 N. C., 654, 158 S. E., 188; Rice v. Panel Co., 199 N. C., 154, 154 S. E., 69.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rice v. . Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Parrish v. . Armour Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Parrish v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Bryson v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Russell v. Western Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Swink v. . Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Holmes v. M. G. Brown Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.