Legal Opinion

Holmes v. M. G. Brown Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchbNCK, J.

“The condition antecedent to compensation is the occurrence of an (1) injury by accident (2) arising out of and (3) in the course of employment.” Conrad v. Foundry Co., 198 N. C., 723. The first and third antecedent occurrences are found for the plaintiff, but both the hearing Commissioner and the Industrial Commission found that the death of the deceased did not arise out of his employment, which finding, since it is supported by competent evidence, was binding upon the Superior Court and is binding upon us. Winberry v. Farley Stores, Inc., 204 N. C., 79; Webb v. Tomlinson, 202 N. C., 860,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Webb v. . TomlinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Winberry v. Farley Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Rowe v. . Rowe-Coward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Swink v. . Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Swink v. Carolina Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API