Legal Opinion
Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 23, 1969No. Appeal, No. 416PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Mr.
Justice Jones,
In April of 1962, Paul Hale (appellant) filed a claim petition under the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act,1 alleging that he was totally disabled from silicosis after being employed as a sandblaster by Metalweld, Inc., from 1952 to April 3, 1962.
*111At the Referee’s hearing, appellant introduced evidence tending to prove that he is now suffering from silicosis, that he was employed by Metalweld cleaning and grinding metal products and that he used a substance called “Black Diamond” in his blaster and carborundum as a grinding medium. At a subsequent hearing,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Metz v. Quakertown Stove WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Scott v. United States Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Crews v. CareySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox v. American Asbestos Textile Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1972
- Moyer v. Morysville Body Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969