Legal Opinion

Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 1, 2000No. 98-2162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

¶ 1. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict against it on the products-liability claim of Linda M. Green. Green claimed, and the jury found, that latex gloves manufactured by Smith & Nephew were defective and unreasonably dangerous, and were a cause of damages she suffered as a result of her allergic reaction to them. In light of evidence that a connection between latex gloves and the type of allergic reaction suffered by Green was essentially not known when Smith & Nephew made the latex gloves that she used, Green did not argue before the trial court, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Morden v. Continental AGWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. LossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Conley Publishing Group Ltd. v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. TainterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  5. In Re Commitment of SmalleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API