Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
¶ 1. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict against it on the products-liability claim of Linda M. Green. Green claimed, and the jury found, that latex gloves manufactured by Smith & Nephew were defective and unreasonably dangerous, and were a cause of damages she suffered as a result of her allergic reaction to them. In light of evidence that a connection between latex gloves and the type of allergic reaction suffered by Green was essentially not known when Smith & Nephew made the latex gloves that she used, Green did not argue before the trial court, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Morden v. Continental AGWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Conley Publishing Group Ltd. v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. TainterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- In Re Commitment of SmalleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.