Legal Opinion

Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1982No. 16057-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted claimant Cook’s petition for review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals affirming a decision of the administrative law judge. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer only one question on review: Did the administrative law judge err in finding that there was no jurisdiction to consider claimant Cook’s request for review because it had been filed 5 days late?

The facts necessary to a determination of this issue are as follows. On 27 September 1979, Cook suffered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Allen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Chavez v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kohlbeck v. HandleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API