Levy v. Rosenblatt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 84, Oct. T., 1902, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1900, No. 244, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Simon Levy v. Harry M. Rosenblatt, William B. Landauer and Emanuel H. Massman, trading as H. M. Rosenblatt & Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The plaintiff was employed in the defendants’ factory for *545several months as a porter or common laborer, when, • on March 14, 1900, he was transferred to another department^ where he assisted in etching or bisquing opal glass eggs. This mechanical result was secured by submerging the glass into a tank containing a solution of hydrofluoric acid, consisting of fifty-two parts of hydrofluoric acid, forty-eight parts of water, and twenty-five parts of carbonate of ammonia, the effect being to make the glass bisque or opaque, after which the eggs were placed by the etcher on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wagner v. H. W. Jayne Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Reese v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Caldwell v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Corcoran v. WanamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Lebbering v. Struthers, Wells & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Franczak v. Nazareth Cement Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Allen v. Gilman, McNeil & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
- Hartman v. Reading Wood Pulley Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Ligon v. John A. Beck Salt Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Glodzik v. Whink Products Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.