Glodzik v. Whink Products Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
1Opinion of the Court
NEALON, J.,
The manufacturer of a rust stain remover containing hydrofluoric acid which severely injured the plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment seeking the dismissal of: (1) all tort claims on the grounds that plaintiff allegedly misused the product without gloves; (2) plaintiff’s failure-to-wam claim *243which is purportedly preempted by the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA); and (3) plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages. Since reasonable minds could differ as to whether plaintiff’s actions constituted unforeseeable, outrageous or extraordinary misuse, the defendant is not…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vito Milanese, Jr. And Suzanne Milanese v. Rust-Oleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- SHV Coal, Inc. v. Continental Grain Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.