Ligon v. John A. Beck Salt Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 176, April T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1906, No. 5, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Jefferson Ligón v. John A. Beck Salt Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Kennedy, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,024.50. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The only assignment of error in this case is, that, un*584der all the evidence in the case, the verdict should be for the defendant. The appellant cites no authorities in his argument, but submits a critical.analysis of the testimony in an endeavor to satisfy this court that the error of which he complains was so glaring that the court below should have directed the verdict in favor of the defendant.
The plaintiff was employed to convey salt in a wheelbarrow from the first to the second floor of the appellant’s plant, the method being to place the loaded wheelbarrow on an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reese v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Brownfield v. Hughes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1889
- Levy v. RosenblattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Groves v. McNeilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilbert v. WeichtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916